Arnon!

Wow - you put up a “vanity domain” and it’s just like old times! Since there’s only one other person reading this site, and his name is Arnon, I figure I should dedicate this entry to you^h^h^h^h him. By the way, I take umbrage at your^h^h^h^h^h his blanket use of the term “vanity domain” - I simply chose danrochman.com because it’s obvious, simple to find (you found it, didn’t you?) and even simpler to remember. It most certainly is NOT clever. I can’t say I’m proud of that, but for some reason I prefer the slurs “unimaginative” or “pragmatic to a fault” over “vain”. Hmmm. On second thought…

Other than that, life rolls on. Lovely Derek and Handsome Tina were here for about a week, and it was lots of fun for all, and there’ll be some stills in the Gallery soon to prove it. But hours after they left I was on my way to Chico, CA (for workworkwork), and spent three long days out there, then spent the weekend doing more workworkwork, and am finally getting a few minutes in before bed to post.

Mack Camera has shipped my digital camera back - I should be able to pick it up at UPS one night this week (after workworkwork)… It’s funny that whenever I *don’t* have it, all I see are photo ops.

The next major site update involves going to a 3-column layout (CSS, no tables), ripping off some of the usual sources (mostly blogstyles.com), and then adding some cool CSS dropdown menus (from gazingus.org). And some behind-the-curtain work to put in a new (OpenBSD) firewall and a secure (SSL) reverse-proxy. No reason, really - I just like to play with those sorts of toys. But all that will have to wait for this weekend.

Now to bed, so I can be up early for - you guessed it - workworkwork.

Cheers, Arnon - you old so-and-so!

One Response to “Arnon!”

  1. Arnon Says:

    So and So?

    I think I may take umbrage at that simply because taking umbrage seems to be the style du jour.

    There must be others reading this…

    Have you considered adding the url as a sig to all your work-mail? Watch the stats go upupUP!

    In further developments, I’m in TO, did I mention that?

Leave a Reply